- my overall thought is,
- description: a person who is interested in how life happened in a noisy world, and in letting people who don’t do experiments and don’t read papers get to also connect with their animal, process selves. maybe a vitalist-mechanicist linneage, descartes modifier.
- projection: my assumption that the public should know science is done in communities not as lone geniuses (he is not the only person doing work on developmental biology, working on pattern organizers, problems of form function organization processes causations in embryos, or thinking about the relationship between cells and organisms! there’s 100+ years in the western science of many people, there’s other cultures with their own development related world views and beautiful stories. i wish more people know this, so they get the other perspectives too, more richenss and examples and options, on this topic that apparently is so meaningful to many people). that bioelectricity is probably a thing, but regenerative medicine with electricity might not solve the root issues around cancer esque sufferings. that it’s wonderful to bridge experiments with philosophy and history that connect with the psychological worlds of common people.